se.cs.ieu.edu.tr
Course Name | |
Code | Semester | Theory (hour/week) | Application/Lab (hour/week) | Local Credits | ECTS |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fall/Spring |
Prerequisites |
| ||||||||
Course Language | |||||||||
Course Type | Elective | ||||||||
Course Level | - | ||||||||
Mode of Delivery | - | ||||||||
Teaching Methods and Techniques of the Course | |||||||||
Course Coordinator | - | ||||||||
Course Lecturer(s) | |||||||||
Assistant(s) | - |
Course Objectives | |
Learning Outcomes | The students who succeeded in this course;
|
Course Description |
| Core Courses | |
Major Area Courses | ||
Supportive Courses | ||
Media and Managment Skills Courses | ||
Transferable Skill Courses |
Week | Subjects | Required Materials |
1 | Introduction to and motivation for Mathematical Modelling | Introduction to Computational Optimization Models for Production Planning in a Supply Chain, Chapter 1 |
2 | Optimization in production and inventory systems | Lecture notes |
3 | Optimization in production and inventory systems | Lecture notes |
4 | MIP algorithms | Yves Pochet, Laurance A. Wolsey,.Production Planning by Mixed Integer Programming, Springer, ISBN 9780387299594, Chapters 2 and 3 |
5 | MIP algorithms | Yves Pochet, Laurance A. Wolsey,.Production Planning by Mixed Integer Programming, Springer, ISBN 9780387299594, Chapters 2 and 3 |
6 | Starting with an MRP Model | Introduction to Computational Optimization Models for Production Planning in a Supply Chain, Chapter 2 |
7 | Starting with an MRP Model | Introduction to Computational Optimization Models for Production Planning in a Supply Chain, Chapter 3 |
8 | Extending to an MRP II Model and Further Improvements | Introduction to Computational Optimization Models for Production Planning in a Supply Chain, Chapter 4 |
9 | Software implementations | Introduction to Computational Optimization Models for Production Planning in a Supply Chain, Chapter 7 |
10 | Midterm Examination | - |
11 | Capacitated Lot Sizing Problems and Reformulations | M Denizel,H Sural. On alternative mixed integer programming formulations and LPbased heuristics for lotsizing with setup times. Journal of the Operational Research Society (2006) 57, 389–399 |
12 | Capacitated Lot Sizing Problems and Reformulations | M Denizel,H Sural. On alternative mixed integer programming formulations and LPbased heuristics for lotsizing with setup times. Journal of the Operational Research Society (2006) 57, 389–399 |
13 | Discrete Lot Sizing and Scheduling Problem and Sequence Dependent Setups | A. Drexl , A. Kimms. Lot sizing and scheduling Survey and extensions. European Journal of Operational Research 99 (1997) 221–235 |
14 | Continuous Setup and Proportional Lot Sizing and Scheduling Problems | A. Drexl , A. Kimms. Lot sizing and scheduling Survey and extensions. European Journal of Operational Research 99 (1997) 221–235 |
15 | Project Presentations | |
16 | Review of the Semester |
Course Notes/Textbooks | Stefan Voβ, David L. Voodruff. Introduction to Computational Optimization Models for Production Planning in a Supply Chain, Second Edition, Springer, ISBN 9783540298786 Yves Pochet, Laurance A. Wolsey,.Production Planning by Mixed Integer Programming, Springer, ISBN 9780387299594 |
Suggested Readings/Materials | Lecture PowerPoint slides,Reading Handouts |
Semester Activities | Number | Weigthing |
Participation | 1 | 10 |
Laboratory / Application | ||
Field Work | ||
Quizzes / Studio Critiques | 1 | 5 |
Portfolio | ||
Homework / Assignments | 1 | 10 |
Presentation / Jury | ||
Project | 1 | 15 |
Seminar / Workshop | ||
Oral Exam | ||
Midterm | 1 | 25 |
Final Exam | 1 | 35 |
Total |
Weighting of Semester Activities on the Final Grade | 30 | 65 |
Weighting of End-of-Semester Activities on the Final Grade | 1 | 35 |
Total |
Semester Activities | Number | Duration (Hours) | Workload |
---|---|---|---|
Course Hours (Including exam week: 16 x total hours) | 16 | 3 | 48 |
Laboratory / Application Hours (Including exam week: 16 x total hours) | 16 | ||
Study Hours Out of Class | 15 | 1 | |
Field Work | |||
Quizzes / Studio Critiques | 1 | 5 | |
Portfolio | |||
Homework / Assignments | 1 | 2 | |
Presentation / Jury | |||
Project | 1 | 18 | |
Seminar / Workshop | |||
Oral Exam | |||
Midterms | 1 | 9 | |
Final Exams | 1 | 15 | |
Total | 112 |
# | Program Competencies/Outcomes | * Contribution Level | ||||
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | Be able to define problems in real life by identifying functional and nonfunctional requirements that the software is to execute | |||||
2 | Be able to design and analyze software at component, subsystem, and software architecture level | |||||
3 | Be able to develop software by coding, verifying, doing unit testing and debugging | |||||
4 | Be able to verify software by testing its behaviour, execution conditions, and expected results | |||||
5 | Be able to maintain software due to working environment changes, new user demands and the emergence of software errors that occur during operation | |||||
6 | Be able to monitor and control changes in the software, the integration of software with other software systems, and plan to release software versions systematically | |||||
7 | To have knowledge in the area of software requirements understanding, process planning, output specification, resource planning, risk management and quality planning | |||||
8 | Be able to identify, evaluate, measure and manage changes in software development by applying software engineering processes | |||||
9 | Be able to use various tools and methods to do the software requirements, design, development, testing and maintenance | |||||
10 | To have knowledge of basic quality metrics, software life cycle processes, software quality, quality model characteristics, and be able to use them to develop, verify and test software | |||||
11 | To have knowledge in other disciplines that have common boundaries with software engineering such as computer engineering, management, mathematics, project management, quality management, software ergonomics and systems engineering | X | ||||
12 | Be able to grasp software engineering culture and concept of ethics, and have the basic information of applying them in the software engineering | |||||
13 | Be able to use a foreign language to follow related field publications and communicate with colleagues | X |
*1 Lowest, 2 Low, 3 Average, 4 High, 5 Highest